A post by our guest editor, John Worthington.

In today's service organizations, we're inundated with data about customer and employee experiences. We track satisfaction, sentiment, and journey friction points. Yet many teams struggle to convert this rich experience data into real organizational learning and improvement.

The key? Bridging experience management with experiential learning — and grounding it in a methodical framework like the Unified Service Management (USM) method.

Experience Is the New Frontier — But It’s Not Enough

Experience Management (XM) has grown in importance. Organizations increasingly realize that delivering consistent, positive experiences — for customers, employees, and users — is a competitive differentiator. Tools like Experience Level Agreements (XLAs), journey mapping, and experience analytics are gaining traction.

But here’s the catch: measuring experience isn’t the same as learning from it.

Experience data becomes transformative only when it’s internalized, reflected upon, and used to drive change — this is where experiential learning comes in.

Experiential Learning: Turning Experience into Insight

Inspired by the work of David Kolb, experiential learning is a structured process where individuals or teams:

  1. Have an experience (a project, an incident, a feedback moment)
  2. Reflect on it (what went well, what didn’t, what surprised us)
  3. Conceptualize new ideas (derive principles, challenge assumptions)
  4. Experiment actively (test new behaviors or changes)

This cycle isn’t just academic — it’s foundational to learning organizations, a concept Peter Senge popularized in The Fifth Discipline. As Senge writes, “Organizations learn only through individuals who learn.” Without structured reflection and shared insight, we repeat mistakes, react instead of adapt, and miss the opportunity for growth.

The Double Loop: Beyond Behavior, Into Belief

Chris Argyris introduced the concept of double-loop learning, which pushes beyond tweaking actions (single-loop) to examining and reshaping the underlying assumptions, norms, and mental models that drive behavior.

  • Single-loop: “We didn’t meet the SLA. Let’s improve our response time.”
  • Double-loop: “Why is speed our only metric? Are we measuring what the customer truly values?”

Double-loop learning aligns perfectly with experience management data — because perceptions often challenge our ingrained assumptions. When customers say, “You solved the issue, but I felt ignored,” we’re invited not just to do better, but to think differently.

The Role of USM: Structure Enables Learning

The Unified Service Management (USM) method provides the structure that enables this learning to scale and stick.

USM simplifies service management by reducing it to five processes and one universal management system. This structure supports both repeatability and adaptability — which are essential for experiential learning to become embedded in how services are delivered.

With USM, every workflow (whether a request, wish, change, or incident) becomes a learning opportunity. Since each process uses the same building blocks, insights gained in one context can easily be applied in another.

Example: Embedding the Learning Loop in a USM Workflow

  1. A service disruption occurs (Workflow type 3 or 4)
  2. The team logs the incident and follows the generic USM activity pattern (Plan–Do–Check–Act)
  3. In the Check phase, experience data is reviewed — from both operational metrics and customer sentiment
  4. The Act phase can include a structured reflection session (experiential learning)
  5. Patterns in roles, means, or process are updated — affecting not just this service, but any others sharing those elements

This tight integration of experience and learning transforms service teams from reactive executors to proactive learners.

Leadership Matters: Extreme Ownership in the Loop

This brings us to leadership. In Extreme Ownership, Jocko Willink emphasizes that leaders must own everything in their world — including outcomes they didn’t directly control.

This mindset is essential when experience data is uncomfortable or reflective sessions surface tough truths.

  • The experiential learning cycle requires psychological safety.
  • The double-loop model demands humility.
  • The USM method gives teams clarity and a common language to tackle these challenges.

Leaders who embrace Extreme Ownership don’t pass the buck when experiences fail to meet expectations — they own the feedback, lead the learning, and act on it.

Closing the Loop, Continuously

In a truly learning-oriented service organization, Experience Management becomes the input, and Experiential Learning becomes the engine. The USM method ensures that this engine is aligned, scalable, and sustainable.

“The only sustainable competitive advantage is an organization’s ability to learn faster than the competition.” — Peter Senge

When we treat experience not as a KPI, but as an opportunity for growth — and back that up with methodical learning and ownership — we stop managing services and start evolving them.

Final Thought

If you're in the business of services — whether in IT, HR, Facilities, or beyond — and you’re interested in how to operationalize this kind of thinking, I’d be happy to discuss how the USM method supports these goals.

Feel free to reach out — especially if you’re working to humanize IT, improve service quality, or develop learning-focused leadership.

==/==

If you enjoyed John's post and it made you think about improving your own organization, please check out his USM Professional profile and his personal website, or better: contact John for a free consultation.
John has posted this blog earlier in his USM method News LinkedIN newsletter. If you want to read his posts when they're published - subscribe to John's channel.